The OGC 3D Summit Delivers Advancements and Challenges
- Details
- Created on September 25, 2011
- Written by Matt Ball
Technical Overview
The opening panel of the event discussed the multiple data formats and software products that are used with 3D modeling. The CityGML data format holds a great deal of promise, according to the panel, but there are some areas where it needs to improve, such as in marrying the modeling world with semantics, feature layers, and knowledge about features.
With more 3D data formats hitting the Web, including photo point clouds from Autodesk Photofly and Microsoft Photosynth, the community is bracing for a flood of more 3D data. To address this data influx, new schemes will have to be developed to marry 3D imagery with 3D models. The group visualized a future where off-the-shelf cameras will capture 3D models that can be quickly integrated for a detailed, and constantly updated, 3D city model.
The need for easier interfaces was also discussed as an impediment, given the rise of the gaming generation, and their familiarity with easy navigation. Today's 3D data capture and manipulation software are sophisticated and often hard to learn tools. The panel closed by suggesting that a new cartographic styling for 3D was likely in the offing, with semantics helping to analyze obects and determine best how to display data.
Augmented Reality
3D models are a critical input for registering augmented reality for the mobile user. The model is the element to bring all the information together for such applications as games, entertainment, marketing, tourism, and navigation.
Christine Perey, and Basel-based entrepreneur in this space, presented on th eneed to bring all the data together in order to make augmented reality development happen. She is embarking on a B-City effort to put the framework in place, to hold contests on augmented reality application development and to spur the data collection effort. While the effort is getting its start in Basel, she has plans to extend the project to Barcelona, Berlin, and Beijing.
On the standards front, there is an Augmented Reality Markup Language (ARML) that is being developed. Wikitude is leading this effort as there are more than 1,000 developers working on this project for desktop and mobile projections of a 3D world. The wikitude effort focuses on combining ARML with HTML and Javascript for a browser-based augmented reality platform.
Challenges
The panel on 3D challenges and opportunities tackled some of the pain points mainly in the building trades. With a typical project dealing with models at many different scales, and with many different modelers, it's not unheard of for a large engineering and development firm to use hundreds of software packages and modeling tools for any given project.
The movement between the different packages often strips out the intelligence in the model, which either needs to get built back in or is lost completely. The interoperability challenges in this space have a high dollar cost related to time delays, poor construction, and construction errors. With the high pain experienced in the building trades, it's incumbent upon the software developers to push for greater interoperability and more intuitive and inclusive software interfaces.
CityGML Advancements
Europe is well ahead of North America with adoption and development of 3D modeling. CityGML had its start in Germany seven years ago, and has made great progress. There's even a mandate that all existing building models will need to be modeled in 3D in comply with a data specification that is virtually identical with CityGML within the next three years as part of the INSPIRE initiative.
CityGML has taken the approach to model at different levels of detail. The standard also allows for the integration of raster and vector data, sensor information and the integration of augmented reality along a continuum of scales. CityGML 1.1 is a proposed minor revision of the standard that will be backward compatible and that will incorporate the ability to produce conceptural models of such things as bridges and tunnels, that posed problems in the past.
Illustrating the advancement of Europe, the Netherlands presented a countrywide effort for 3D modeling linked to an e-government initiative. The effort will integrate 2D and 3D models in large-scale for the entire country, with plans to be finalized by the end of the year.
Future of 3D
Wrapping the day was a panel on the future of 3D, with representatives from Autodesk, Oracle and Bentley. The group reiterated that semantic integration is a fture-oriented challenge that must be tackled, along with the need for sound data management, and highly interoperable 3D models, because you can't put all 3D data into just one database.
The semantic approach will help with different business processes, and to achieve the holy grail of a single view across a full range of information. Increasingly, BIM models are being required as an improved way of modeling that improves efficiency, including a mandate for all government projects to use BIM in the UK by 2015. With this process, comes a new way of sharing models and ironing out liability so that projects come in on-time and on-budget.
The community at this event all shared the belief that 3D and 3D modeling have a promising future to solve many real-world problems. The group is at the forefront of wrestling with data and workflow issues to speed the adoption, and the meeting proved an important venue for the open discussion of where are we now, where to we need to go, and what are some of the challenges that need to be overcome.
-
2011-09-28 19:18:44 |Unregistered| Carsten Roensdorfthanks for the review, Matt!
I actually think it will be possible to store all 3D information of a country in a single database if required. Whether it's one single database or not, the goal will be to have one holistic model that can integrate a wide array of data.
One clarification: Inspire won't require the creation of all buildings in 3D within the next few years--that would be a bit much, but the provision of all existing building data in a a 2D or 3D profile of a data specification, which is virtually identical with CityGML
Carsten
OGC 3D information management co-chair
-
I posted this summary on a number of LinkedIn Groups and this was a question from one of the group members.
-----
Alan Keown • Thanks for the post Steven.
The following statement is made in the section under "The Future of 3D":
'because you can't put all 3D data into just one database.'
Has the 3DIM WG established this as a fact?
I think we are at a crossroad in this whole '3D GIS' thing and my biggest fear is that people will get lost in the trees - what we need are universal, coherent data models; especially for geometry.
I've done a lot of research and implementation over the last 10 years and I am firmly convinced that it can be all in the one database (well: ultimately, one 'set' of databases conforming to a unified datamodel).
-
2011-09-29 14:50:38 |Unregistered| Thomas H. KolbeThis is exactly what CityGML is all about: creation of a common data model (and, following from that, exchange format) which will make 3D city models also semantically interoperable - and not only in regard of common geometry models or coordinate reference systems.
And this is already being in use in many cities and real world applications around the globe (as was discussed, however, not so much in North America, yet).
CityGML is very similar to IFC as it is used as the underlying data model and exchange format for Urban Information Modelling (in an analoguous way to IFC, which is the basis for interoperable Building Information Modelling). CityGML and IFC are complementary, since IFC is addressing the building scale in a high level of detail and CityGML addresses the most relevant objects of the urban space (incl. natural features like vegetation, DTM, water bodies) at city scale.
-
2011-09-29 14:54:06 |Unregistered| Thomas H. KolbeThe statement, "because you can't put all 3D data into just one database" was not established as a fact by 3DIM, but rather describes a common experience that many practitioners have made over many years working with 3D models.
The statement means that it is not realistic to have all data related to a city model within one physical database. Even if you would have an organisation like UK OS or a cadastre department providing a 3D base model, other departments like environmental offices or urban planning divisions would have extra data that is likely not to be stored together in the same database. It is more likely that these different datasets will be linked to each other. However, in order to make sure that data from different sources can unambiguously refer to items in other datasets, a joint (data) model with a common understanding would be required.
Thus, the conclusion is: all data belonging to a city model will most likely not be stored togeth...
-
Nice summary, and interesting discussion on the 'not-one-database' concept. Another example of connecting databases, similar to CityGML and IFC models, is the connection between CityGML a/o IFC and subsurface databases. In this example, scalability is a major issue.
For instance: the Geological survey of the Netherlands has created a voxel model of the subsurface (0 to 30m deep) with a voxelsize of 250m (x) x 250m (y) 0.5 (z). This might be a sufficient for large construction projects such as large industrial sites (in IFC?) to use as a source for subsurface information. But for a home-owner wanting to dig his own pool (e.g. Cadaster 3D in CityGML), the resolution might be a bit low. So scalability is the key word in connecting several 3D databases, and I was wondering if this came up in any way in the OGC summit in that context?
Also, in the summary Matt states that "The standard also allows for the integration of raster and vector data (...)". C...
-
2011-10-04 10:21:44 |Unregistered| Carsten RoensdorfI believe the underground raster integration has been done in a couple of research projects, though it wasn't explicitly presented at the summit.
CityGML integrates rasters in the form of DTM grids and also allows you to put a raster on any surface, such as a texture. This isn't restricted to 2D: You could put a the geometric detail of a terrestrial scanned lidar image on the facade of every building to model the fine facade detail. Any other raster dataset could be integrated in a similar way, though it will be necessary to define a (vector) feature it relates to.
-
2011-10-06 00:01:49 |Unregistered| Bruce BannermanMatt,
Nice summary.
I was not able to stay for the end of the event, so I missed some of the later discussions. Thanks for this article.
My take homes from the event are:
- There are a wide variety of 3D requirements. Not all of these requirements are related to orthogonal data on the earth's surface. There was a very good example of sub-surface 3D modelling of non-uniform geoscience features (solids?). There are also similar use cases for atmospheric data etc;
- While much of our 3D effort is based around producing 'Pretty Pictures', we really need much more than this. It would be good to see more advanced tools that allow for analysis of 3D objects and 3D equivalents of GIS spatial overlay type functions. As an aside, a number of mining related systems have been exploring this for 20+ years;
- I agree that the CityGML team are developing an outstanding application schema for exchanging 3D data *and* attr...
Perspectives
What do sensors add to a decision support system?
An often-quoted Business Week article from 1999 stated that, “In the next century, planet Earth will don an electric skin…”...
Is it time for focused publications that aim to make sense of change at both the global and local scales?
Change is a constant that is inevitable, but what isn't inevitable are disruptive impacts. The more we know about our...
GeoEye Proposes to Purchase DigitalGlobe
The mergers and acquisitions within the geospatial technology space are white hot right now, with news Friday that GeoEye approached...
Why did Trimble buy SketchUp, and why did Google sell?
It’s funny, my first reaction to the Trimble buys SketchUp news was that it was some kind of spoof, and...
If Enhanced View cuts come, why not remove resolution restrictions?
A feature in the New York Times outlines the battle that is brewing in Congress to defend the use of...
Latest Events
| Mon May 28 Brazil - MundoGEO#Connect 2012 |
| Tue May 29 UK - European Earth Surface Process Group |
| Tue May 29 US - UCGIS 2012 Spring Symposium - GIScience 2.0 |
| Sat Jun 02 Germany - Resilient Cities 2012 |
| Mon Jun 04 @02:00 - 11:00AM US - Hexagon 2012 |
| Mon Jun 04 @08:00 - 05:00PM Denmark - GMES in Action Conference |
| Tue Jun 05 South Africa - Smart Cities Conference |
| Tue Jun 05 @02:00 - 11:00AM US - Eyeo Festival |
| Tue Jun 05 @08:00 - 05:00PM Denmark - GMES in Action Conference |
| Sun Jun 10 Taiwan - The International Summer School on Mobile Mapping Technologies 2012 |
Current Readers
Vector1 Media
Pubishers of Sensors & Systems, Informed Infrastructure, and Asian Surveying & Mapping.
Indeed I can see a country's 3D (CityGML) database being one database. But I can also see this database linked to other sources like BIM models, legal documents etc. in a federated way.
Ton