Why the Crisis Mapping Community Needs 'People Protection Standards 1.0'

The issue is whether the crisis mapping community will decide to self-regulate in a proactive way before serious lapses by any of us put civilians in jeopardy. What is urgently required most of all are people protection standards which include but also transcend how we collect, secure, and release data obtained through the use of ICTs during disaster and related settings. Through our experiences monitoring civilian populations in Sudan by satellite over the past 14 months, we have encountered firsthand the critical lack of doctrine, training, and protocols available to help us ensure that we do not inadvertently cause harm to those we aim to assist. Read More

Comments (0)
Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:

Perspectives

What do sensors add to a decision support system?

Written byMatt Ball
on May 22, 2012

An often-quoted Business Week article from 1999 stated that, “In the next century, planet Earth will don an electric skin…”...

Is it time for focused publications that aim to make sense of change at both the global and local scales?

Written byMatt Ball
on May 15, 2012

Change is a constant that is inevitable, but what isn't inevitable are disruptive impacts. The more we know about our...

GeoEye Proposes to Purchase DigitalGlobe

Written byMatt Ball
on May 04, 2012

The mergers and acquisitions within the geospatial technology space are white hot right now, with news Friday that GeoEye approached...

Why did Trimble buy SketchUp, and why did Google sell?

Written byMatt Ball
on April 29, 2012

It’s funny, my first reaction to the Trimble buys SketchUp news was that it was some kind of spoof, and...

If Enhanced View cuts come, why not remove resolution restrictions?

Written byMatt Ball
on April 22, 2012

A feature in the New York Times outlines the battle that is brewing in Congress to defend the use of...

Tag Cloud

Current Readers