Cadastral Expert Improves Business with Low-Cost GPS


 

An architect by training, Prudenzi served in the Brescia Office of Cadastre for ten years, then, fifteen years ago, he opened his own independent office to perform appraisals and verifications of local real estate property and technical consulting to the Court of Brescia.  Because land survey is just one aspect of his multi-faceted practice, Prudenzi had until recently relied solely on a total station for land survey work. He knew, though, that there’s no one tool for every job; in difficult terrain, GPS would be a better solution. But GPS has been cost-prohibitive, particularly for the limited use Prudenzi expected to give it. He knew too that GPS products have been changing rapidly.  GPS would make sense if he found a high-accuracy system that would amortize quickly even with limited use. 

 

He found an ideal solution after carefully researching the available information, consulting numerous colleagues, and testing many different GPS brands and models for accuracy, ease of use and cost.  With the study complete, Prudenzi found that Magellan, one of the fasting-growing GPS brands in the world, offered the best solution with its ProMark3 RTK.  Its low cost, high accuracy, simplicity of operation, and versatility proved superior. Prudenzi said that Giorgio Viaggi, of Guido Veronesi SRL, the Italian distributor for the Magellan ProMark3, provided excellent assistance in helping to select the ProMark3 RTK.

 

Affordable accuracy

Prudenzi reports that in many tests conducted in his backyard on different days, the ProMark3 RTK consistently outperformed Magellan’s own published accuracy standards. For example, he says, ”In static mode using a free reference network, Spidernet, with its reference stations from 90 KM to 130 KM distant, the same points showed a variation from 0.02 to 0.04 m, against a predictable and acceptable datum, which Magellan publishes, of 0.095 to 0.125 m (0.005m + 1ppm).  The true values are decidedly better than those expected.”

 

And in different RTK tests he conducted, he says, “using previously calculated points, the verifiable error is always in my experience less than 0.01 m.”

 

 

Post processing: convenience and low cost

In Prudenzi’s view, a decisive advantage of the ProMark3 RTK is its ability to simultaneously collect raw data during RTK sessions.  “I want to underline,” he says, “that Magellan has great post-processing software, GNSS solutions office software, and it’s free. In my experience, surveyors can be frightened by the cost of post-processing software and so they do surveys only in RTK. When I’m in RTK mode, I now always collect for 15 seconds on every point to gather the raw data that later allows me to easily reduce my error down to 0.001 to 0.003m.  In this way, the ProMark3 RTK delivers a level of accuracy the equal of instruments costing more than twice as much.” He adds, “It is very simple to both record data in RTK mode together with raw data.  The raw data is then easily used in the GNSS solutions software to achieve millimeter level accuracy, all with a low-cost L1 unit.”

 

All-inclusive base + rover

He particularly likes the ProMark3 RTK’s base plus rover system, which is all-inclusive together with a license-free plug and play radio.  While much of Lombardy has good VRS coverage, he often works in zones with limited coverage, one reason he particularly likes the base plus rover freedom offered by the ProMark3 RTK.

 

Prudenzi notes that many surveyors, because of the high cost of GPS system and to hold costs down, will purchase only a rover and use differential corrections broadcast from nets in their area. The problem is that in too many areas differential corrections are not available and even when they are, the virtual reference station will sometimes be some distance away.  A virtual station 4 km distant, he points out, will have an error of almost 4 mm.  But with the ProMark3 RTK, its low cost includes a base station and rover, at a cost equivalent to what another brand’s rover alone costs.  “When I collect in RTK using the base station and simultaneously collect raw data, I can achieve a precision up to ten times better than the rover only with differential corrections.”

 

Business performance

Alessandro always uses the ProMark3 RTK in difficult physical conditions, such as demanding terrain and significant vegetation.  In these conditions a job that would take two days with a total station takes but a couple of hours with the ProMark3 RTK.  Importantly, the relatively low cost of the ProMark3 RTK means that even in Prudenzi’s limited field survey work, the cost is quickly amortized.

 

Italian cadastral law requires the use of three reference points to locate a house.  Therefore, a house might require a minimum of more than a dozen points to be measured. And those points all need to be right on.  Even though the ProMark3 RTK is half the cost of competitive brands offering similar results, its accuracy is so impressive that Prudenzi now uses the unit for almost half his land survey jobs. 

 

Comments (0)
Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:

Perspectives

What do sensors add to a decision support system?

Written byMatt Ball
on May 22, 2012

An often-quoted Business Week article from 1999 stated that, “In the next century, planet Earth will don an electric skin…”...

Is it time for focused publications that aim to make sense of change at both the global and local scales?

Written byMatt Ball
on May 15, 2012

Change is a constant that is inevitable, but what isn't inevitable are disruptive impacts. The more we know about our...

GeoEye Proposes to Purchase DigitalGlobe

Written byMatt Ball
on May 04, 2012

The mergers and acquisitions within the geospatial technology space are white hot right now, with news Friday that GeoEye approached...

Why did Trimble buy SketchUp, and why did Google sell?

Written byMatt Ball
on April 29, 2012

It’s funny, my first reaction to the Trimble buys SketchUp news was that it was some kind of spoof, and...

If Enhanced View cuts come, why not remove resolution restrictions?

Written byMatt Ball
on April 22, 2012

A feature in the New York Times outlines the battle that is brewing in Congress to defend the use of...

Tag Cloud

Current Readers