Marine Debris Likely to Worsen in 21st Century
- Details
- Created on September 19, 2008
A National Research Council committee was convened at the request of Congress to assess the effectiveness of international and national measures to prevent and reduce marine debris and its impact. Marine debris, man-made materials that intentionally or accidentally enter and pollute the ocean, can cause significant harm. For instance, birds, fish, and marine mammals ingest debris, especially plastics, which can lead to digestive problems and uptake of toxic compounds. Animals can also suffer injuries or die after becoming entangled in fishing-related debris such as plastic net fragments, rope, and packing straps. Marine debris also poses a health and safety hazard to beachgoers and divers, and could impact coastal recreation and tourism revenue. While marine debris comes from sources both on land and at sea, the committee focused on debris discharged at sea for the purposes of this report.
Although Congress previously called for federal interagency coordination to address the marine debris problem, leadership and governance remain inefficient and current mitigation efforts are episodic and crisis driven, the committee found. A national framework to identify priorities for dealing with marine debris and its removal efforts should be established. Additionally, Congress should designate a lead agency to expand programs to comprehensively address the problem, including land-based marine litter, derelict fishing gear, shipborne waste, and abandoned vessels.
Under the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) Annex V, which entered into force in 1988, many discharges from ships are permissible at sea. The committee said this approach does not encourage innovation or measures to minimize waste. It suggested that MARPOL Annex V be amended to include a prohibition on discharge of garbage at sea, allowing for limited exceptions based on specific vessel-operation scenarios. In order to discourage waste disposal at sea, ships also need to have access to adequate shoreside waste reception facilities for garbage and should be provided incentives, such as low disposal fees to use them, the report adds.
Nevertheless, some ships have already adopted zero or minimal discharge practices. The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency should disseminate best management practices for how vessels can attain zero discharge, source reduction, and waste minimization, the committee urged. EPA should also take the lead to work with academia, industry, and nongovernmental organizations to develop industry standards and guidelines for source reduction, reuse, and recycling for solid wastes that are generated during ship operations.
The committee was specifically asked to address the challenges surrounding derelict fishing gear. While regulated under MARPOL Annex V and domestic implementing laws, it is a persistent problem because of accidental losses and legal loopholes. Also, current regulations do not include accountability measures for commercial and recreational fishing vessels for loss of their fishing gear, offering few incentives to take responsibility for cleanup.
Effective marking of fishing gear is critical for identifying the sources or fisheries that may have deployed the gear, and NOAA should develop marking protocols, the report claims. Fishery management organizations should also adopt a "no fault" policy regarding the documentation and recovery of lost fishing gear. Under this policy, local fishermen, state officials, and the public should develop cost-effective derelict fishing gear removal and disposal programs, and fishermen participating in removal efforts could receive financial credit or be exempted from landfill fees.
Moreover, the high costs and difficulty in providing adequate reception facilities, particularly in remote areas, discourages proper disposal of used fishing gear and can also be a disincentive to retrieval. Therefore, EPA, NOAA, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should help fishing communities explore alternative strategies and technologies for management, disposal, and recycling of used and recovered gear.
Within the issue of derelict fishing gear, the committee also addressed the growing concern about a specific type of gear known as fish aggregating devices, which are man-made floating objects designed to simulate natural debris and attract fish. These devices pose a threat as they are allowed to float freely and are often made of waste fishing net. The committee concluded that abandoned fish aggregating devices become derelict fishing gear when the captain of the vessel does not retrieve them. Under MARPOL Annex V, this should be considered an illegal disposal if the devices contain synthetic ropes, webbing, or other plastics. NOAA should modify the federal regulations to clarify the circumstances under which abandoned fish aggregating devices become illegal discharge. The committee also indicated that international and domestic fisheries organizations should do more to regulate these devices and prevent them from becoming debris.
The report was sponsored by the U.S. Coast Guard. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies. They are private, nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and health policy advice under a congressional charter. The Research Council is the principal operating agency of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering. A committee roster follows.
Copies of TACKLING MARINE DEBRIS IN THE 21ST CENTURY are available from the National Academies Press; tel. 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242 or on the Internet at HTTP://WWW.NAP.EDU. Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).
Perspectives
What do sensors add to a decision support system?
on
May 22, 2012
An often-quoted Business Week article from 1999 stated that, “In the next century, planet Earth will don an electric skin…”...
Hits:362
Read More...
Is it time for focused publications that aim to make sense of change at both the global and local scales?
on
May 15, 2012
Change is a constant that is inevitable, but what isn't inevitable are disruptive impacts. The more we know about our...
Hits:324
Read More...
GeoEye Proposes to Purchase DigitalGlobe
on
May 04, 2012
The mergers and acquisitions within the geospatial technology space are white hot right now, with news Friday that GeoEye approached...
Hits:474
Read More...
Why did Trimble buy SketchUp, and why did Google sell?
on
April 29, 2012
It’s funny, my first reaction to the Trimble buys SketchUp news was that it was some kind of spoof, and...
Hits:2269
Read More...
If Enhanced View cuts come, why not remove resolution restrictions?
on
April 22, 2012
A feature in the New York Times outlines the battle that is brewing in Congress to defend the use of...
Hits:518
Read More...
Latest Events
| Mon May 28 Brazil - MundoGEO#Connect 2012 |
| Tue May 29 UK - European Earth Surface Process Group |
| Tue May 29 US - UCGIS 2012 Spring Symposium - GIScience 2.0 |
| Sat Jun 02 Germany - Resilient Cities 2012 |
| Mon Jun 04 @02:00 - 11:00AM US - Hexagon 2012 |
| Mon Jun 04 @08:00 - 05:00PM Denmark - GMES in Action Conference |
| Tue Jun 05 South Africa - Smart Cities Conference |
| Tue Jun 05 @02:00 - 11:00AM US - Eyeo Festival |
| Tue Jun 05 @08:00 - 05:00PM Denmark - GMES in Action Conference |
| Sun Jun 10 Taiwan - The International Summer School on Mobile Mapping Technologies 2012 |
Current Readers
Vector1 Media
Pubishers of Sensors & Systems, Informed Infrastructure, and Asian Surveying & Mapping.

