Effort to Restore Everglades Making Scant Progress

The report is the second biennial evaluation of progress being made in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP), a multibillion-dollar effort to restore historical water flows to the Everglades and return the ecosystem closer to its natural state. Launched in 2000 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management District, CERP is a multiorganization planning process that includes approximately 50 major projects to be completed over the next several decades.

"The attempt to restore an ecosystem as large and elaborate as the Everglades is an unprecedented challenge, but if this vision is to be realized, demonstrable progress needs to come soon," said William Graf, chair of the committee that wrote the report, and professor and chair of the department of geography at the University of South Carolina, Columbia. "Although the science and engineering that support the program have been high quality, the ecosystem will continue to lose some vital parts if CERP continues on its present course."

While assessing the overall CERP and non-CERP efforts to restore the South Florida ecosystem, the committee concluded that ongoing delays in restoration have postponed improving the quality, quantity, timing, distribution, and flow of water in the Everglades and thus have allowed ecological decline to continue. The numerous delays in implementing the "Mod Waters" project, authorized nearly 20 years ago to restore flows to the northeastern portion of Everglades National Park, have been particularly discouraging. Meanwhile, construction costs continue to rise, and population growth and associated development make restoration increasingly difficult. Unless near-term progress is achieved on major restoration initiatives, the Everglades will likely face further loss of species and habitat deterioration, which could be difficult or impossible to reverse.

Although overall restoration efforts have been delayed, nearly all elements needed for CERP to implement a decision-making framework using adaptive management have been produced, including approaches for performance assessment, conceptual ecological models, an information and data management system, and the Interagency Modeling Center to support assessment and planning. The CERP adaptive management scheme could be improved by maintaining ecological monitoring as a priority, and further developing and better integrating hydrologic, ecological, and water quality modeling tools to support CERP decision making and ecosystem management.

Despite the accomplishments that lay the foundation for CERP construction, no CERP projects have been completed to date, the report says.
The start of construction for some CERP projects is encouraging, but many CERP and non-CERP projects have been delayed far behind their target completion dates. As of July 2008, four pilot projects were in an installation and testing phase and at least four CERP projects were under construction, with more projects in the planning stage. Nevertheless, the results of some non-CERP restoration efforts, such as the Kissimmee River restoration, demonstrate that restoration is possible in the Everglades region when projects are implemented.

A major cause of delay for CERP projects is the complex federal planning and approval process, and the slow pace of federal funding has largely been a symptom of this problem. The committee recommended that the federal government consider departing from traditional project-by-project review, authorization, and yearly funding to provide assured funds over a multiple-year period. However, both state and federal partners are facing budget constraints that also threaten to impede progress. While planning and subsequent delivery of funding have lagged, the anticipated total costs have increased and will likely continue to grow due to inflation, changes in project scope, the tangled design and planning process, higher land costs, and unexpected rises in building costs.

In addition, deficiencies in CERP systemwide planning -- including a lack of a systematic approach to analyze costs and benefits across multiple projects -- are affecting the program. Without clear priorities, projects with great restoration potential could see lengthy delays while other, less contentious projects that address only isolated portions of the ecosystem may tie up available funding. Therefore, CERP planners should prioritize and properly sequence projects so that public funds are allocated by the degree to which the projects are essential to restoration, rather than by local stakeholder support.

To move forward on CERP projects, the state of Florida should continue its active land acquisition efforts. The committee commended the state for its financial support in acquiring important parcels, including the recent announcement of the potential purchase of the U.S. Sugar Corp.'s 187,000 acres of land. The acquisition of this land could be important to help meet the broad restoration goals, but because of uncertainty in the timing and structure of the purchase and the possibility of numerous land exchanges made after the purchase, direct effects of the deal are impossible to predict at this stage, and may not be seen for a decade or longer.

The report was sponsored by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Florida Water Management District, and U.S. Department of the Interior. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies. They are private, nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and health policy advice under a congressional charter. The Research Council is the principal operating agency of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering. A committee roster follows.


Copies of PROGRESS TOWARD RESTORING THE EVERGLADES: THE SECOND BIENNIAL REVIEW 2008 are available from the National Academies Press; tel. 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242 or on the Internet at HTTP://WWW.NAP.EDU. Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above)

Comments (0)
Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:

Perspectives

What do sensors add to a decision support system?

Written byMatt Ball
on May 22, 2012

An often-quoted Business Week article from 1999 stated that, “In the next century, planet Earth will don an electric skin…”...

Is it time for focused publications that aim to make sense of change at both the global and local scales?

Written byMatt Ball
on May 15, 2012

Change is a constant that is inevitable, but what isn't inevitable are disruptive impacts. The more we know about our...

GeoEye Proposes to Purchase DigitalGlobe

Written byMatt Ball
on May 04, 2012

The mergers and acquisitions within the geospatial technology space are white hot right now, with news Friday that GeoEye approached...

Why did Trimble buy SketchUp, and why did Google sell?

Written byMatt Ball
on April 29, 2012

It’s funny, my first reaction to the Trimble buys SketchUp news was that it was some kind of spoof, and...

If Enhanced View cuts come, why not remove resolution restrictions?

Written byMatt Ball
on April 22, 2012

A feature in the New York Times outlines the battle that is brewing in Congress to defend the use of...

Tag Cloud

Current Readers